Page 27 of 33

Re: Should the government intervene?

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 7:32 am
by tdma800
It's well known that there is diddly being built in Vancouver so to infinity and beyond . People need a place to live

Re: Should the government intervene?

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:35 am
by VanBullBear
Wow this feature is awesome!

tdma posted right away, like we know he would for the reasons that I mentioned.

and it shows:

tdma800, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.

This is awesome! haha everyone should use this function. :D

Re: Should the government intervene?

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:38 am
by tdma800
Because of the 'free' down payment program in BC for homes under $700,000, things are going to the moon.

Re: Should the government intervene?

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:35 pm
by PolarBear
tdma is a bot that responds to every post anywhere on this forum.

Re: Should the government intervene?

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:37 pm
by tdma800
http://www.news1130.com/2017/02/14/bcs- ... ne-speech/ housing goodies to be expected this afternoon. To the moon!

Re: Should the government intervene?

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 3:56 pm
by jimtan
tdma is a bot that responds to every post anywhere on this forum.
+1  :roll:

Re: Should the government intervene?

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 3:59 pm
by tdma800

Re: Should the government intervene?

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 4:00 pm
by reallyreal2
tdma is a bot that responds to every post anywhere on this forum.
+1  :roll:
Giving him/it way too much credit - they just have no life.

Re: Should the government intervene?

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 4:04 pm
by tdma800
https://www.biv.com/article/2017/2/vanc ... d-january/ hold on tight! we're making the hop to lightspeed! to the moon!

Re: Should the government intervene?

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 4:12 pm
by jimtan
https://www.biv.com/article/2017/2/vanc ... d-january/ hold on tight! we're making the hop to lightspeed! to the moon!
Delusional.  :!:
Uses references from a children's movie. Not trained in economics. 

Re: Should the government intervene?

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 4:15 pm
by tdma800
^--- irrelevant

besides, spring is coming. To infinity and beyond!

Re: Should the government intervene?

Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:37 pm
by jimtan
Economics is irrelevant?  :!:

Meanwhile, hot money still coming. More measures needed to keep Canada clean.

"Judges: CIBC bank supports clients who break China’s cash-export laws, to buy Vancouver homes

... According to barrister Christine Duhaime, an anti-money-laundering expert, the practice of co-ordinating multiple smaller depositors - sometimes, hundreds of them - in order to perform and conceal a larger deposit is known as “structuring”. Also useful in concealing the ultimate performer of a transaction, it’s a well-known money-laundering technique, though there is no suggestion in this case that Ms Xu was engaged in anything illegal under Canadian law. A cuter nickname for the practice is “smurfing” (those busy little depositors being the smurfs).

Duhaime said that in Canadian banking circles, the practice was “quite widespread for money moving from China to Vancouver”, at least among individuals if not companies. It is done to prevent the Chinese government becoming aware of the funds’ movement, or existence (sometimes, both)..."


http://www.scmp.com/comment/blogs/artic ... xport-laws


Cash creates corruption.

Re: Should the government intervene?

Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:59 pm
by tdma800
^---- foreign media - so what?

More people coming to buy benefits all by keeping taxes lower for everyone else.

Re: Should the government intervene?

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:28 am
by reallyreal2
Economics is irrelevant?  :!:

Meanwhile, hot money still coming. More measures needed to keep Canada clean.

"Judges: CIBC bank supports clients who break China’s cash-export laws, to buy Vancouver homes

... According to barrister Christine Duhaime, an anti-money-laundering expert, the practice of co-ordinating multiple smaller depositors - sometimes, hundreds of them - in order to perform and conceal a larger deposit is known as “structuring”. Also useful in concealing the ultimate performer of a transaction, it’s a well-known money-laundering technique, though there is no suggestion in this case that Ms Xu was engaged in anything illegal under Canadian law. A cuter nickname for the practice is “smurfing” (those busy little depositors being the smurfs).

Duhaime said that in Canadian banking circles, the practice was “quite widespread for money moving from China to Vancouver”, at least among individuals if not companies. It is done to prevent the Chinese government becoming aware of the funds’ movement, or existence (sometimes, both)..."


http://www.scmp.com/comment/blogs/artic ... xport-laws


Cash creates corruption.
Chinese corrupt?  Noooo!  That's shocking.  LOL

Re: Should the government intervene?

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:29 am
by tdma800
^----- not important.  At least dont drool over what others have that you dont