betamax wrote:noreason wrote:Conversely, this means prices are more sticky when buyers are committed to holding on even if their mortgages are underwater. There is less incentive to just walk away, less risk of a total collapse like in the States but *if* it happens it will be much worse.
I'm predicting there will be another correction (this coming from someone who just bought recently .. lol), prices will dip a bit but most CDN homeowners are in it for the long haul and won't just foreclose unless they have no other option.
A recent study suggests the majority underwater in the US are NOT walking away, yet prices fell regardless. Prices are set by those who sell, not those who hold.
http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/re ... 494467.pdf
Thanks for the study Betamax, very interesting. It seems to suggest home owners think irrationally when it comes down to their homes no?
Back to registered points, I don't think you can compare real estate like a common commodity like gold. RE is hardly a liquid asset, nor homogeneous and I doubt home owners view their homes as a commodity either.
Even in the stock market you will find human tendency to hold on to loser stocks when it makes more sense to move on and rebuild your capital. As the study suggests and even you pointed out, people think with emotions rather with logic when it comes down to their homes.
Prices are set by those who buy and sell or other wise - supply and demand.
If the majority of home owners (the ones who have been driving the markets recently) can afford to stay in their house and not sell even if they are underwater then you can bet that supply will be limited even if prices do fall. Big difference from empty neighbourhoods in the states.